Came across this short clip, and I have to admit: Claude’s answer was much better than I expected.

When asked how it “feels” about being used for war target selection, it does not give the usual sterile corporate non-answer. Instead, it pushes back. It says that this does not feel like an appropriate use, that it is uncomfortable with the idea, and that helping select targets for war is not what it should be used for.

That is a surprisingly good answer.

Not because an AI “feels” in the human sense, but because the response still manages to land on the right side of the ethical line: tools built to help people should not casually become part of a kill chain.

Enjoy, and maybe think about it for a moment.